Journal

Identity · 18 October 2026

Common brand identity mistakes, and how to avoid them

Starting without a strategy, never writing the colours down, taking delivery without guidelines. Seven brand identity mistakes and what to do instead.

A brand identity rarely breaks because of one big mistake. It breaks through small, quiet decisions. Someone forgets to note a colour code. Someone squeezes the logo into a corner. Someone draws a new mark for a new product. None of these is a disaster on its own, but a few months later the brand doesn’t look like itself.

Here are seven common ones, and how we avoid them in our own projects.

This is the big one. Drawing a logo before you know what the brand says, who it’s for and how it differs from competitors is like aiming without a target. You might end up with a nice mark. It won’t carry the brand.

That’s why our projects always start with analysis: the audience, the sector and competitors, how the brand talks today and which of its assets still work. Design comes after.

2. Never writing the colours down

“Our colour is navy” isn’t enough. Which navy? A screen needs one code and print needs another. Pekin Yapı Market’s red is defined three ways: #CA2027 for screen, RAL 3020 for paint and Pantone 711 C for print. Without those three codes, the sign maker, the printer and the web designer would each pick a different red.

3. Too many typefaces

It’s tempting to try a new typeface for every job. The result is pages that don’t know about each other. For most brands, one family in a few weights is enough. Taze Sepet uses Alegreya Sans in four weights (Regular, Medium, Bold and ExtraBold) for headlines, text and the interface. Its wordmark is drawn on a different face, Expletus Sans Bold, but that face stays in the logo, because it doesn’t support the Turkish letters Ğ, İ and Ş.

4. Settling for one logo file

A horizontal logo won’t fit a vertical space. A detailed logo stops being readable at profile-picture size. So a logo needs several versions from the start: horizontal, vertical and a small version with the symbol on its own. Taze Sepet has four, the fourth carrying the slogan. Miabella’s logo package includes the monogram by itself, next to the full logo.

Even a perfectly drawn logo looks wrong when text or another logo presses against it. The fix is a clear space rule. At Kischla, that’s one x on every side, where x is the width of the K’s upright bar. Because the measure comes from the logo, it works the same on a business card and a big screen.

6. Taking delivery without guidelines

If you have the logo files but nothing tells you how to use them, every new job turns into guesswork. Brand guidelines put the colour codes, the typeface, the logo versions, the clear space and the misuse examples in one place. Taze Sepet’s run to 17 pages, from the brand essence to a website draft. They’re what protects the identity when the people who designed it aren’t around.

7. A new logo for every product

As a brand grows, new products arrive, and giving each one its own logo feels natural. But every new logo splits the brand a little more. For Prodarc we went the other way. The parent brand’s P stays the same on its two products, Prodarc SIEM and Prodarc SOAR, and the product name sits in a small tag next to it. Nobody has to learn a new logo.

What these mistakes have in common

All seven come from decisions that were never written down. If the strategy isn’t written down, the design can’t lean on it. If the colours aren’t, they change with every job. If the rules aren’t, whoever does the next job makes them up.

That’s why we build every identity as a system and hand it over with its rules. You can see how we work, step by step, or get in touch to talk about your brand.